Search & retrieval

Philips · Market Logic

Vendor-reportedHealthcarePilotEnterpriseLLM

Vendor-reported. The customer is named and the numbers are quoted from the source page, but the account comes from the vendor. No independent confirmation.

Reported by marketlogicsoftware.com (vendor self-report). Checked against the source page on 2026-09-05. 7 of 9 figures below appear on that page word for word; the rest are marked.

The problem

Existing knowledge management solutions use unintuitive search logic, making it hard to get commercial insights from knowledge assets, leading to long insights discovery pathways.

What was deployed

Vendor
Market Logic
Products
DeepSights
Technique
LLM
Build or buy
Bought off the shelf
Deployment
SaaS
Data used
150 high-quality documents curated around specific healthcare themes from Philips' knowledge assets.
Scale
~150 curated documents; 2 testers; 27 test questions (pilot scope)

What changed

Each row is quoted from the source. Figures we could not find on the page in those words are marked — they are kept, not deleted, so you can judge them.

64%Winning answer success ratefrom 50%

In terms of winning answers, ChatGPT and Bing had a moderate success rate of 50%, while DeepSights surpassed them, successfully answering questions 64% of the time.

Not found on the source page in these words

71%Answer reliability (verifiable sources)from 14%

Compared to ChatGPT and Bing, which provided verifiable, trustworthy information only 14% of the time, DeepSights offered a much higher level of reliability. The client was able to verify the sources cited in DeepSights’s answers 71% of the time.

Not found on the source page in these words

89%Proficiency in answering business questionsfrom 89%

When compared to Philips’ existing knowledge management system, DeepSights™ demonstrated similar proficiency in answering business questions, both achieving an 89% success rate.

Quoted word for word from the source

89%Hit rate (answers in top 3 search results)from 59%

While the answers were found within the first three search results only 59% of the time on the internal platform’s search engine, DeepSights™ achieved this 89% of the time.

Quoted word for word from the source

instantaneouslyTime to find an answerfrom 16.8 minutes

On Philips’s internal platform, it took the team an average of 16.8 minutes to find an answer. In contrast, with DeepSights™, the answer appeared instantaneously.

Quoted word for word from the source

7.5 hoursResearch time saved per personover the course of the test (27 questions)

Estimated 7.5 hours of research saved per person over the course of the test (27 questions).

Quoted word for word from the source

16.8 minutesResearch time saved per question

16.8 minutes research time saved per question: DeepSights™ vs. Philip’s search function

Quoted word for word from the source

Answer reliability

57% higher level of answer reliability, compared to ChatGPT and Bing

Quoted word for word from the source

Answer hit rate

30% higher answer hit rate than Philips’ internal platform’s search function

Quoted word for word from the source · round percentage, no baseline given

Generative AI is like the dawning of the Age of Aquarius … it’s going to differentiate people who adopt this technology from the people who resist it. And the people who adopt it will definitely have an advantage.
Tom Mostert, Global MI&A Head of Knowledge Management & Competitive Insights, Philips

Difficulties and limits

Sources

Similar deployments

Walmart · Microsoft

22% — global ecommerce growth

Independently reportedRetail & e-commerce · Search & retrieval · LLM · In production · 2024

Osprey · NOVOS

72.6% — share of AI answers

Vendor-reportedRetail & e-commerce · Search & retrieval · LLM · In production

Safe · Victoria Olsina

40.88% — Enterprise keyword visibility

Vendor-reportedOther · Search & retrieval · LLM · In production

WS Audiology · QueryNow

85% increase — daily active users

Vendor-reportedHealthcare · Search & retrieval · NLP · In production

SoWork · iGrow

100% — AI Visibility Score

Vendor-reportedTechnology & software · Search & retrieval · NLP · In production · 2026