Document processing

United Trust Bank (UTB) · NashTech

Vendor-reportedBanking & financeUnited KingdomPilotAI agents

Vendor-reported. The customer is named and the numbers are quoted from the source page, but the account comes from the vendor. No independent confirmation.

Reported by nashtechglobal.com (vendor self-report). Checked against the source page on 2026-09-06. 1 of 1 figures below appear on that page word for word.

The problem

UTB’s QS team managed a high-volume, manual workflow where each report required careful extraction, validation and reconciliation of key financial and compliance elements.

What was deployed

Vendor
NashTech
Products
Gemini AI, Azure OpenAI, n8n, SharePoint Online, MongoDB, Azure container
Models
GPT-4
Technique
AI agents
Build or buy
Built in-house or to order
Deployment
Hybrid
Data used
QS PDFs, mocked financial data

What changed

Each row is quoted from the source. Figures we could not find on the page in those words are marked — they are kept, not deleted, so you can judge them.

5–6 minutesQS report analysis timefrom 30–60 minutes

QS report analysis reduced from 30–60 minutes to 5–6 minutes, achieving an 80–90 per cent improvement.

Quoted word for word from the source

uniform summary for every QS report, ensuring consistencyconsistency of QS report summaries

The PoC produced a uniform summary for every QS report, ensuring consistency across assessments and enabling a clearer audit trail for future decision-making.

Quoted word for word from the source

consistently identified discrepancies and exceptions that can be overlooked during manual checksDiscrepancies and exceptions identified

The PoC consistently identified discrepancies and exceptions that can be overlooked during manual checks. This shows how automation can support a stronger control environment by providing consistent, rule-based validation.

Quoted word for word from the source

The proof of concept demonstrated just how transformative agentic AI can be. By engaging with NashTech, we were able to take requirements directly from our business experts, rapidly evaluate AI tools and language models and see tangible early results. At scale, we expect this capability to reduce a process that currently takes an hour to just a few minutes, freeing our experienced team to focus on exceptions and higher-value work rather than routine data evaluation.
Leanne Sweeney, Head of Business Transformation at UTB

Difficulties and limits

Sources

Similar deployments

iTromsø · IBM, VC2

10 minutes per day — time spent reviewing potential stories

Independently reportedMedia & entertainment · Document processing · NLP · In production

Amplitude · Wolfia

4X — throughput of security questionnaires

Vendor-reportedTechnology & software · Document processing · AI agents · Scaled

Adyen · Rossum

70 — automation rate

Vendor-reportedBanking & finance · Document processing · NLP · Scaled · 2023

Skaylink · Moterra

dropped by around 80% — NIS2 preparation time

Vendor-reportedTechnology & software · Document processing · LLM · Scaled

OM Pharma · DrugCard

3 minutes — review time per article

Vendor-reportedPharma & biotech · Document processing · NLP · In production