Process automation

Oil and Natural Gas Corporation (ONGC)

Vendor-reportedEnergy & utilitiesIndiaScaledEnterpriseAI agents

Vendor-reported. The customer is named and the numbers are quoted from the source page, but the account comes from the vendor. No independent confirmation.

Reported by spe.org (vendor self-report). Checked against the source page on 2026-09-06. 4 of 4 figures below appear on that page word for word.

The problem

Manually building and calibrating well models for approximately 600 wells required several months of continuous engineering effort.

What was deployed

Products
Pipesim engine, well-analysis Python library
Models
small language model (SLM)
Technique
AI agents
Build or buy
Built in-house or to order
Deployment
Custom build
Data used
validated input data, Excel or CSV files containing well and survey data
Scale
approximately 600 wells (Case Study 1, offshore stimulation-planning); 370 tubing-sensitivity simulations across 3 offshore fields (Case Study 2)

What changed

Each row is quoted from the source. Figures we could not find on the page in those words are marked — they are kept, not deleted, so you can judge them.

exceeded 700engineering hours saved (Case Study 1, ~600-well stimulation planning)

Conservatively, the total time saved in this case study exceeded 700 engineering hours, without compromise in modeling consistency or quality.

Quoted word for word from the source

under 1 hoursimulation execution timefrom large manual modeling effort

All 370 simulations were executed automatically in under 1 hour of wall-clock time.

Quoted word for word from the source

exceeded 320engineering hours saved (Case Study 2, 370-simulation tubing sensitivity)

The estimated net saving exceeded 320 engineering hours, while enabling comprehensive tubing-sensitivity evaluation across the full well population.

Quoted word for word from the source

exceeded 1,000combined engineering hours saved (both case studies)

Combined savings across the two projects exceeded 1,000 engineering hours.

Quoted word for word from the source

within a single daytime to complete modelingfrom several months

What would normally have required months of distributed manual effort was completed within a single day of supervised automation.

Quoted word for word from the source

Difficulties and limits

Sources

Similar deployments

Shriram Finance

less than 3–4 hours — Onboarding Turn-Around-Time (TAT)

Independently reportedBanking & finance · Process automation · Classical ML · In production

GE Aerospace

Independently reportedManufacturing · Process automation · Classical ML · Scaled

Apollo Tyres

under 10 minutes — Time for root cause analysis

Independently reportedManufacturing · Process automation · AI agents · In production

Broadcom · Moveworks

88% — autonomous IT resolution rate

Independently reportedTechnology & software · Process automation · NLP · Scaled

Amazon · Amazon

10% more — shopper spend

Independently reportedRetail & e-commerce · Process automation · Computer vision · Scaled · 2024

icare · SAS

increased by 15% — accuracy

Independently reportedInsurance · Process automation · Classical ML · Scaled · 2019