iTromsø · IBM, VC2
10 minutes per day — time spent reviewing potential stories
Independently reportedMedia & entertainment · Document processing · NLP · In production
Artificial intelligence, professionally covered
Document processing
Vendor-reported. The customer is named and the numbers are quoted from the source page, but the account comes from the vendor. No independent confirmation.
Reported by curia.com.au (vendor self-report). Checked against the source page on 2026-09-06. 1 of 1 figures below appear on that page word for word.
Each contract review required approximately 80 minutes, creating a significant constraint on practice growth and limiting the time available for business development.
Each row is quoted from the source. Figures we could not find on the page in those words are marked — they are kept, not deleted, so you can judge them.
“The implementation of Curia Contract Review has reduced Concise Conveyancing's average contract review time from 80 minutes to 30 minutes - a remarkable 62.5% reduction that allows more time for business growth and client service.”
Quoted word for word from the source
“the time factor saved on my letter of advice is reason enough to continue using Curia.”
10 minutes per day — time spent reviewing potential stories
Independently reportedMedia & entertainment · Document processing · NLP · In production
70 — automation rate
Vendor-reportedBanking & finance · Document processing · NLP · Scaled · 2023
4X — throughput of security questionnaires
Vendor-reportedTechnology & software · Document processing · AI agents · Scaled
dropped by around 80% — NIS2 preparation time
Vendor-reportedTechnology & software · Document processing · LLM · Scaled
3 minutes — review time per article
Vendor-reportedPharma & biotech · Document processing · NLP · In production
100% — invoice automation
Vendor-reportedManufacturing · Document processing · NLP · In production